ITLF lambasts N. Biren Singh over his ‘blatant lies’ about cause of sectarian conflict in Manipur

0
349
CM N. Biren Singh | File Photo

Deeply offended by the remarks made by Manipur CM Biren Singh in his recent interview with the Times of India, where he blatantly lied about the cause of the sectarian conflict in the state, the Indigenous Tribal Leaders’ Forum (ITLF) rebuked N. Biren Singh that all his accusations are bereft of available evidences and facts.

In its press release issued on Monday, ITLF said, “Singh’s accusation that the conflict was “planned years ago” by some section of tribals with ‘illegal immigrants’ goes against all available evidence and the fact that Kuki-Zo tribals faced the brunt of the violence – in the number of deaths, displaced, and the loss of homes and livelihood.”

“If the conflict was planned for “years” by tribals, why was there no loss of innocent Meitei lives in tribal areas when violence broke out, while unwitting tribal civilians in Imphal Valley were slaughtered without warning? Which community was prepared and which was not?”

The tribal forum asserted that there are numerous national media reports quoting central security forces that say Meitei radicals like Arambai Tenggol carried out attacks on tribal civilians, and no corresponding tribal groups targeted Meitei civilians.

The CM’s allegation of tribals starting the violence to demand a “separate nation” is ridiculous, as tribals have made it very clear that any demands they have because of the ethnic cleansing of their community come under the Constitution of India, it stated.

“In fact, the May 3 violence scuppered a peace accord between tribal Soo groups and the central government which was to be signed on May 8. A report by The Wire news website said Manipur’s CM was not in favour of the peace treaty. This means that the CM had a very good reason to start a conflict. Tribals did not.”

The ITLF Spokesperson, Ginza Vualzong said that the Chief Minister’s war on drugs, implementation of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, and his “illegal immigrants” rhetoric all targeted Kuki-Zo tribals and Kuki-Zo areas. “A certain amount of pushback from the community was only natural in the form of protests, rallies, and civil disobedience,” he said adding that the Meitei militia groups like Arambai Tenggol and Meitei Leepun were the ones preparing for a violent confrontation which led to the deaths of almost 100 tribal civilians in the valley, who were totally unaware of the conspiracy in the first two days of the conflict.

The ITLF, once again, urged the central government to recognize the physical and emotional separation between Kuki-Zos and Meiteis. “We do not accept a government that arms one community against us while attempting to portray us as the aggressor,” said Ginza Vualzong.